On February 27, the U.S. Officially Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos as proposed The delay of two years of Obama’s rule was intended to address the disproportionate identities of students of color for special education – and to disambiguate the discipline of these students. This delay has been in the works for months, and if you read it Notification Closely, it is clear that Davos does not merely want to delay the rule – he wants to scrap it altogether.
At her confirmation hearing last year, DeVos answered famous questions about the Students with Disabilities Act and the Americans with Disabilities Education Act. When asked if she would implement the law, she What was said It was “the best left for the states.” Later in the hearing, he What was said She was “confused” about the law. But her rollback of this regulation confirms her original statement: She thinks that protecting the rights of children with disabilities is not in her job description.
Cartoon on President Donald Trump
This particular rule finally put some teeth into a legal requirement that started 1997 And expanded to 2004: It mandates states to identify certain groups of students for special education services or to help them identify school districts and help them to fix it. Unfortunately, the way states approached this long-term need was wildly inconsistent across the country. A 2013 Report good The Government Accountability Office found that the states identified only two percent of the districts as challenges in the region, with half of the reported districts coming from five states. Sing too concluded The way some states counted over- and under-identification “made it unlikely that any district would be identified,” while one state, Louisiana, identified 73 out of 356 districts.
Real Regulation It simply states that all states should use a standard method for over-and under-identifying, by examining the possibility of identifying a group of students for special education compared to all other students. This is not a national requirement for how much over- or under-identification is, and it does not require any specific action by states or districts when inequality is discovered. But this makes it more likely that states and districts will take the issue more seriously, and parents and advocates will be able to see where systemic problems may occur.
And these systemic problems are real. As original Regulation Explained, black students are more than twice as likely as other students to be identified as having emotional disabilities, an identity that can lead to a stadmate and Disfellowship From general education classes. And Native American students are identified as having specific learning disabilities at almost twice the rate of other students.
there also The research The suggestion is that – when controlling for poverty and other risk factors – students of color may actually be less recognized for special education services, and therefore should not receive the support they need. In either case, the regular approach and data that regulation provides is critical to understanding and addressing these problems.
Unfortunately, ignoring the real and obvious systemic barriers to education that exist for students of color – and especially students of color who have disabilities – are some of the trademarks of Donald Trump and Betsy DeVos. Follows the delay of this rule Report She is also considering roll back guidance that helps school districts address the use of suspensions and expulsions for students of color.
Equally troubled, the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights is fully removed Any mention of systemic investigation from its instructions to investigators. DeVos is now asking investigators to ignore the broader context of the discrimination complaint, and this has made it easier to dismiss the complaints.
Of course, DeVos has not yet officially delayed special education regulation or withdrawn guidance on school discipline. But its other The action On civil rights – from limiting systemic investigations to refraining transgender students from discrimination to refusing to cut staff for civil rights in office – clarifying her inclinations.
The Trump administration is on a mission to roll back federal protections for everything from the environment to health and safety to voting rights. And DeVos has fully adopted its assignment. Despite leading the agency Mission “Promoting educational excellence and ensuring equal access”, “DeVos’ actions make it clear that he is not interested in breaking down systemic barriers to excellence and using them for students of color or disabilities.”