Sat. Nov 28th, 2020

This is not a question we usually ask ourselves, but I think we need special advice in view of the prosecution of 13 Russian factions by Robert Muller. Since the 2016 election, President Donald Trump has called the investigation a “hoax” and a “witch hunt”. Over the weekend, he twice called it “illegal”. On Tuesday, he called it “WITCH HUNT!” But according to Muller’s indictment, a vast criminal conspiracy deliberately tried to undermine the integrity of the election, incite social divisions and wage “information warfare” against the United States.

I do not mean to suggest that in the absence of an information war, Americans may have voted on the basis of correct information. All presidential elections bend facts and distort reality. But we are not talking about acceptable political communication strategy. We are talking about making information an unacceptable weapon, so that it is intended to make it difficult or impossible for citizens to distinguish between true or untrue. We are talking about efforts to poison the public sector for the benefit of foreign countries. Given what we know for Trump’s presidency in a year, it might be more accurate to say that our consent was wrong, or even “distorted”.

This is not a trivial question. Consent is the basis of any government that is not a mafia-state, dictatorship or absolute monarchy. The Declaration of Independence contained consent. This is the fundamental force behind human rights being born, inhuman and universal. It is the center of an independent, just and open society. Without consent, there is no legitimate power. Lack of consent is torture.

John Locke’s “Two Texts of Government” was at the heart of the founders’ thinking. In 1689, he wrote: “Man’s freedom in society is not under any other legislative power, but it is established by consensus in consensus, nor under the dominion of any law, or under the restraint of any law, But will the legislative law apply According to the belief put in it. “

Cartoons on President Trump and Russia

Notice the part I trusted. On Locke, faith was the basis of governments. In the distant past, he wrote, people lived in an unbearable “state of nature”. Every man was a law unto himself, a strong victim of the weak, and feared to be strong. By relying on a sovereign, the people gained protection, but if that trust is violated, the people can revoke their consent. With faith, life is peaceful. Without trust, life is chaotic and chaotic.

Why should we trust Trump? According to a January Washington Post report, he made more than 2,000 inaccurate or misleading statements in more than 350 days. According to the New York Times, in December, the president lied about six times in the past 10 months as former President Barack Obama. And, as I mentioned, when there was an act of “information warfare”, Trump has called the investigation in Russia a “hoax” or a “witch hunt”.

It is hard to imagine anyone in his right mind who can not speak the truth for at least half the time by consenting to be ruled by any president; Who believes it will blow up a compound occupied by murderous gunmen; One who incites violence, who attacks the judges; Who bills from Treasury; And who screams “witch hunt” about an investigation that has brought indictments against half a dozen former associates. It is hard for anyone to imagine that unless it was in his right mind, until a major criminal conspiracy took him into confidence.

Let’s be clear on why the Russians value Trump. Their goal was to widen divisions, erode trust and encourage union unheard from within. But for Trump in Russia, considering all Leadership For that goal. In other words, Trump will reason Anarchy. Such a force, one might argue, threatens a return to a state of nature in which each person is a law unto himself, the weaker one rivals with stronger, stronger fear.

Locke wrote: “The freedom of men under government is a permanent rule for every person of that society to live an equal life, and is made by legislative power in it. Freedom to obey my own will in all things Where that rule is. Describes that no, should not be subject to Unsure, uncertain, unknown, arbitrary of another person(My stress).

There is no end to Russia’s information war. The American intelligence community hopes it will sabotage in the upcoming midterm elections. The head of the National Security Agency, Mike Rogers, told Congress on Tuesday that Russia had “not paid a price that was enough to change their behavior.” He added neither the President nor the Secretary of Defense ordered him to be interrupted.

By now, it is perhaps surprising that Russia’s information war is part of the strategy for presidential election. At some point, it will no longer be taboo.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *