Fri. Nov 27th, 2020

To be filed under Not listening to anyone in the Pentagon would say: “Less is more.” Because when it comes to spending on the priorities of the Department of Defense, there is always more but never enough.

Recently enacted Bipartisan Budget Act of 2018 It was established that lawmakers and the White House spent $ 300 million to expose the budget cap set by the Budget Control Act 2011. Most of it went to the Pentagon, which seems too much.

The largest slice of the Pentagon budget pie goes to operations and maintenance. If you sent your mind back to the President’s budget request Pentagon operating and maintenance expenses in FY 2018, You get a total request of $ 223.5 billion. In a grand agreement that was passed a few weeks ago, the line item went up by nearly $ 282 billion – an increase of over 25 percent. And, amazingly, the Secretary of the Army is now floating a test balloon Asking Congress for extra time To spend the Army’s share of the operation and maintenance piece of the pie ($ 67.6 billion). Because Congress relinquished its responsibility to fund the government in a timely manner, Secretary Mark Osho is saying that he may not have enough time to spend all the extra larges. The original request for the Army’s operations account for FY 2018 was over $ 49 billion.

Why did the Secretary of the Army ask for extra time to spend this special money? Well, Not all dollars are considered equal in the Pentagon. Because of the supremacy of spending on items in the operating and maintenance budget, Congress required the Pentagon to spend all that money in the same fiscal year for which it was appointed. On the other hand, the Pentagon has two years to spend research and development funds, five dollars to purchase dollars (excluding shipbuilding) and appropriated cash for military construction and shipbuilding.

Therefore, we want to give more time to spend our additional approximately 18 billion dollars. I agree that haste sucks and more time can lead to more thoughtful decisions, but the real question is: why didn’t the Pentagon plan to spend this extra money? This answer suggests that Congress is spending money at the Pentagon across the river, with no real plan as to how to spend it. And it is not a wrong way to make spending decisions. The top budget numbers set out in the Bipartisan Budget Act were clearly based on politics and not on requirements, priorities, or requests from agencies receiving funding.

But here’s the kicker. The budget deal did not write dozens of spending bills that fund the government. It only determines the level of top line funding. The country is working under its fifth continuous resolution to keep the government funded at the level of FY 2017 since the beginning of the new fiscal year from October 2017. 1. Appropriation committees in the House and Senate are scrambling to write bills before the end of March 23. Current expansion. It also means that they can adjust the Army’s Operations and Maintenance Fund to the amount they can reasonably spend in FY 2018, because within a few months, Congress will have to turn to fiscal year 2019, where The Army’s operating budget may need to be properly funded.

Congress has some options about how to respond to Graphic’s request. First, Congress can ask the Secretary how much the Army needs to spend on operations in the remaining days of FY 2018 and adjust the appropriated funds downward based on that response. This would certainly be the most logical and unfairly responsible thing. Or Congress can grant its request to convert the funds into multi-year funds.

Unfortunately, I do not expect Congress to take the most logical and unfairly responsible route. If Arizona received a warm welcome regarding this request, make the same request to other service secretaries. And another element of fiscal discipline flies out the window.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *